Category: Wilmar Loading Reports

MEMBERS NOTICE – BDCG approach to agreements with Wilmar

Kalagro

View this email in your browser (us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=a1ba66844415ae49d91df94ac&id=aae7cd4261&e=cc4d914f5a)

Dear Kalamia Members,

Please click on link below to view BDCG’s approach to Agreements with Wilmar.

” BDCG solicitor’s letter regarding the

BDCG approach to Agreements with Wilmar”

kalagro.us3.list-manage.com/track/click?u=a1ba66844415ae49d91df94ac&id=9fe4642c9e&e=cc4d914f5a

============================================================

Member Notice – A Message to Growers – Wilmar Proposal

Kalagro

View this email in your browser (us3.campaign-archive1.com/?u=a1ba66844415ae49d91df94ac&id=41c3c1520a&e=cc4d914f5a)

Dear Kalamia Members,
Please find below a message from Greg Beashel QSL CEO regarding Wilmar’s proposal.

A message to Growers – Wilmar proposal

Dear Grower,

In response to Wilmar’s communication today to growers regarding the current OSA negotiations with Wilmar, we whole-heartedly agree that it is unusual to hold negotiations via the media. That is why we were surprised that Wilmar decided to do just that last Friday without informing QSL of its apparent intention to cease negotiations. Once that had occurred, QSL considered it was important to clarify the misinformation published by Wilmar and will continue to do so given what is at stake for the Queensland sugar industry.

While QSL welcomes Wilmar’s partial disclosure today regarding their current OSA proposal, there are other unreasonable terms contained within Wilmar’s current proposal which they continue to not disclose to their growers. Unfortunately Wilmar has still not advised us directly that negotiations have ceased, nor have we called for negotiations to end, and so QSL continues to regard itself as bound by confidentiality not to disclose the full terms of what Wilmar proposed. But Wilmar has made much in its recent communications about their concession to provide a Free-In-Store (FIS) proposal to QSL, so QSL believes we should provide some context to this key issue.

Unlike standard FIS title arrangements, Wilmar’s quasi-FIS terms would have QSL pay in full and accept title for the growers’ economic interest in sugar (GEI Sugar) when it arrived at the terminal, but Wilmar would retain the control of that sugar until it was exported. In short, while QSL would own the growers’ GEI Sugar it would have no control over that sugar’s management while it is in that terminal. It’s like buying a car but being told by the salesman when and where you can drive it. We reject Wilmar’s contention that controlling sugar owned by QSL is necessary because QSL is the operator of the terminals – we have a long and successful track record of serving multiple marketers. read more